Home > ethics, transhumanism, Uncategorized > Sunday Edition: Abundance, Computing, Animal Communication, and Ethics

Sunday Edition: Abundance, Computing, Animal Communication, and Ethics

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. – Arthur C. Clark, scientist and writer.

With that in mind, let’s talk about magic for a minute. Not so long ago (and in some circles still today) people used to talk about alchemy; turning lead into gold was the usual desire. Without knowledge of elements, atoms, and other basic chemistry, the idea was that one substance could be transmuted into another using the philosopher’s stone which, despite its name, was not always a stone but sometimes an elixir or other substance.

Today, we don’t talk about philosopher’s stones, and rarely talk about turning lead into gold. We could plate lead with gold, of course, but that’s not the same. In theory, one could turn lead into gold by reconfiguring the atoms of lead (82 protons and 82 electrons in six fields, with 126 neutrons in the middle) into atoms of gold (79 protons and 79 electrons in six fields, with 118 neutrons in the middle.) It looks so simple, and indeed we have transmuted lead into gold, but, unfortunately, it take massive amounts of energy to swipe a few basic subatomic particles and turn one element into another.

That notwithstanding, transhumanists hope to convert not just lead into gold, but any element into any other. Like Star Trek’s replicator, scientists hope to use some basic bag of material (it really doesn’t matter what), destroy the material by tearing apart the subatomic particles, and then reassembling them into whatever configuration one wants. Bales of hay could be transmuted into a Ferrari, in theory.  The widespread use of that sort of technology leads to what some transhumanists call abundance; the utter irrelevance of ‘(personal) property’ as such because anything can be turned into anything else. I recently ran across the Foresight Institute’s page on molecular assemblers and I’m fascinated. But, by all accounts, the technology is many years away (but would probably represent the most important invention … ever.)

In the meantime, how is abundance looking? The Huffington Post recently ran an article by Peter Diamandis, who argues that technology has already vastly improved the world as a whole. Global per-capita incomes (inflation adjusted) have tripled, lifespands have doubled, childhood mortality has decreased by 99%. His fascinating article goes on to explain why, despite living in vastly better times (as a world community, not just Americans) we’re still focused on the negative.

To power abundance, of either the molecular assembler or the more recognized variety, we’ll need a lot of computing power. Moore’s Law has predicted, accurately, that the number of transistors on a chip would double every couple of years and, as a corollary, that the processing power would double about every 18 months. Every few years, people predict the end of Moore’s Law, but it’s remained accurate since 1965 (and, more generally, for technology since essentially forever according to Kurzweil.) Researchers from the University of South Whales and Purdue have recently created new wires in silicon a stunning one atom tall by four atoms wide. Such small wires could enable quantum computing in silicon; a stunning feat that would continue Moore’s Law into the foreseeable future. Additionally, it makes nano-scale engineering more feasible.

What could we do with all that computing power? Patrick Tucker of the World Future Society recently offered some thoughts. Artificial Intelligence is already being used to replace workers in China, but even professionals like doctors and lawyers are being helped / replaced by automated robots. Managing all the information being created is vital, so AI is being used to search speeches on TV like one searches the web with Google, and also to sift through human genomes to look for similarities. Google is creating self-driving cars. Researchers in China are identifying the cause of traffic jams based on two years worth of GPS data collected from 33,000 cabs. There will be, in short, need for all the computing power we’re inventing.

I’m going to switch gears for a moment to some random new discoveries. Technology Review reports on new advances in carbon nanotubes that are leading to materials that are more conductive and weigh much less than traditional materials. Meanwhile, technology company Lumus has created a pair of see-through augmented reality glasses that are lightweight and project a HD (720p), 3-D, 87″ screen into the wearer’s field of vision. They’re not the most stylish thing in the world, but who wouldn’t love to throw an 87″ TV into their backpack and set it up in the library? Better yet, let’s put these in a bionic eye. Additionally, scientists are trying to use robots to figure out how language evolves in the natural world, including among animals.

In the realm of ethics, Vinton Cerf argues that internet access is neither a human right nor a civil right in the New York Times opinion pages. This is in response, of course, to the argument that internet access -is- a human right, including a UN Report to that effect. Unsurprisingly, the blogosphere (I’ve wanted to use that word for a while) has lit up with responses on both sides. Here’s one example, from JD Rucker.

Finally, if you’re still feeling down about the world, check out Jason Silva’s videos on techno-optimism. The pattern video at the beginning is particularly good.

  1. January 20, 2012 at 7:01 pm

    After study a few of the weblog posts on your web site now, and I actually like your approach of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark web site listing and might be checking back soon. Pls try my site as properly and let me know what you think.

  2. January 22, 2012 at 10:27 am

    Very good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and desired to state that I possess really enjoyed reading through your blog posts. Any method I’m going to be signing up for your give food to and I hope you post again quickly. Now you appear upon my blog .

  3. January 30, 2012 at 9:10 pm

    I just want to tell you that I am beginner to blogging and definitely liked your web blog. Probably I’m want to bookmark your blog post . You amazingly come with wonderful articles. Bless you for sharing with us your blog.

  4. February 5, 2012 at 5:05 pm

    I entirely appreciate this article. If it’s not trouble post more…

  1. February 2, 2012 at 9:53 am
  2. February 5, 2012 at 4:13 pm
  3. February 8, 2012 at 3:05 pm
  4. February 10, 2012 at 1:09 am
  5. February 10, 2012 at 12:24 pm
  6. February 10, 2012 at 4:22 pm
  7. February 10, 2012 at 8:39 pm
  8. February 10, 2012 at 9:26 pm
  9. February 11, 2012 at 12:53 am
  10. February 11, 2012 at 2:50 am
  11. February 16, 2012 at 10:43 am
  12. February 18, 2012 at 12:57 am
  13. February 21, 2012 at 4:01 pm
  14. February 25, 2012 at 12:13 pm
  15. March 29, 2012 at 2:06 pm
  16. March 29, 2012 at 5:20 pm
  17. April 1, 2012 at 2:57 am
  18. April 4, 2012 at 8:16 pm
  19. April 9, 2012 at 3:43 pm
  20. April 10, 2012 at 8:49 am
  21. April 13, 2012 at 6:30 pm
  22. April 14, 2012 at 5:21 am
  23. April 16, 2012 at 7:22 am
  24. April 16, 2012 at 10:23 am
  25. April 17, 2012 at 7:22 am
  26. April 17, 2012 at 7:22 am
  27. April 17, 2012 at 9:34 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: